Two Winnipeg metropolis councillors are calling on their colleagues to support a motion expressing make stronger for a constitutional divulge in opposition to Quebec’s controversial Bill 21, which bans public servants from wearing non secular symbols.
Winnipeg metropolis councillors Janice Lukes and Shawn Nason boom the message they bought from residents of their wards was certain: Quebec’s Bill 21 is discriminatory, illiberal and unhealthy.
That is what triggered the pair to call on their fellow councillors to support a motion expressing make stronger for a constitutional divulge of the bill.
“I beget or no longer it would be principal to stand up. Or no longer it is a unfamiliar world obtainable correct now. All forms of things are taking place that I’m no longer pleased with — that our constituents … don’t seem like pleased with,” Lukes (Waverley West) urged journalists at metropolis hall on Wednesday.
“I beget or no longer it would be principal as a human rights metropolis, as house to the Canadian Museum for Human Rights, that we as council attach forth a united entrance and communicate up by distinction bill.”
Quebec’s legislation, handed final June, bans certain public servants, at the side of lecturers, law enforcement officers, and authorities attorneys, from wearing non secular symbols — equivalent to head coverings — at work.
Lukes and Transcona councillor Nason introduced ahead a search for of motion on Wednesday, which is in a impart to quiz councillors to make stronger in precept a constitutional divulge to Bill 21 at the Oct. 24 council assembly.
The 2 councillors had been flanked on Wednesday by residents from their wards and representatives from Winnipeg cultural associations.
“Ideal as a consequence of I wear my hijab as an expression of adore does not imply that I’ll pressure somebody to take into consideration in what I take into consideration,” said Tasneem Vali.
Bill 21 creates the aptitude for waves of intolerance, Vali said, that will maybe well circulation toward areas equivalent to Winnipeg and Manitoba.
These sentiments had been echoed by Idris Elbakri, the president of the Manitoba Islamic Affiliation.
“It beats me why a chunk of field topic would pose a probability to any one. Or no longer it is miles a scarf. Or no longer it is miles a turban. Or no longer it is miles a kippah. Or no longer it is miles a infamous,” he said.
“I additionally think that we must communicate loudly by distinction as a consequence of, you understand, is that this going to transfer ahead? Will there be other [measures]?”
Nason says the motion he and Lukes are bringing to metropolis council next week is a possibility for Winnipeg to ease the fears of its many non secular communities.
“We decide up heard our mayor consult with Winnipeg as a human rights metropolis multiple events, and I beget this is a comely opportunity for us as council to work in a collaborative methodology, and one which presentations that we’re an inclusive community,” Nason said.
Simarpreet Singh, who contacted Lukes along with his concerns about Bill 21, says the legislation attacks fundamental human rights of all Canadians.
“We’re going to make a decision up to, as Winnipeggers, as Canadians, stand up to any roughly discrimination that is taking place across Canada, no longer appropriate in Quebec,” Singh said.
“We’re going to make a decision up to stand up without reference to the impart as a consequence of or no longer it is an infringement of fundamental rights and freedoms.”
A spokesperson for Mayor Brian Bowman wrote he hadn’t viewed the motion but, however said Bowman “is adverse to Bill 21, which works in opposition to every part he’s making an attempt to attain to procure Winnipeg an global leader for the protection and promotion of human rights.”
We hate SPAM and promise to keep your email address safe